These Cops Tried EVERYTHING But He Knew His Rights

Watch & Vote

Do they Pass or Fail?

Sign up or Log in to rate or comment on this audit. Sign up is free.
Auditors are also welcome to attach supporting information on their audits here.

ORGANIZATION / PUBLIC SERVANT

PASS FAIL

AUDITOR / PUBLIC

PASS FAIL

Comments

Express yourself, if you wish.
Please respect other opinions, no hate speech, no incitement to violence. Basically, be a cool human :)

Audit Details

General information relayed from the auditor's YouTube audit video.

ORGANIZATION / PUBLIC SERVANT
Majority Vote:
No votes yet. Be the first to vote.
AUDITOR / PUBLIC
Majority Vote:
No votes yet. Be the first to vote.
Audit ID: 34377
Audit type: SECOND AMENDMENT
Region: USA
Date: 10 Oct 2022
Auditor: Audit the Audit profile image Audit the Audit
Title: These Cops Tried EVERYTHING But He Knew His Rights
Description: Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit

Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit

Submit your videos here: auditheaudit@gmail.com

Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellify.com

Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.

This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.

Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.

FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.

Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N0JNMRQOuvA&t=609s

Update video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYXo363YgSg

U People’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/c/UPeople

Sources:

Carroll v. United States- https://bit.ly/3o387gt

Texas v. Brown- https://bit.ly/3cnV2MI

Horton v. California- https://bit.ly/3RiGddo

Maricopa County Parcel Viewer (Search: Seldon Ln & 19th Ave)- https://bit.ly/3wXOP1l

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-1504- https://bit.ly/3RfxgRX

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-1503- https://bit.ly/3KoptPm

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-1502- https://bit.ly/3TjYJUh

State v. Barr- https://bit.ly/3wCN09Q

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-2904- https://bit.ly/3As1xpP

Phoenix Code § 23-3- https://bit.ly/3AQGm1Z

Cohen v. California- https://bit.ly/2OMM14a

City of Houston v. Hill- https://bit.ly/36hULEM
Additional notes: No further details entered

Organization's Details

Typically, the auditor or a moderator would complete the below information. This is optional on whether an auditor would like to add more detail to this public record and share this page, such as the audited organization's contact details.
(also used for those "you do not wanna call.." moments LOL)

Organization name: No further details entered
Type: No further details entered
Location: No further details entered
Contact person: No further details entered
Contact phone: No further details entered
Contact position: No further details entered
Website: No further details entered
Additional Notes: No further details entered

Public Officials Details

Details of the public officials involved - tyrants or stars.

No further details entered
Additional Notes:
Note: The accuracy of information is also dependent on the video information on the YouTube channels.