Good Cop DEFENDS Citizen From His Fellow Officers!
Watch & Vote
Do they Pass or Fail?
Audit Details
General information relayed from the auditor's YouTube audit video.
| ORGANIZATION / PUBLIC SERVANT Majority Vote: |
No votes yet. Be the first to vote. |
|---|---|
| AUDITOR / PUBLIC Majority Vote: |
No votes yet. Be the first to vote. |
| Audit ID: | 47439 |
| Audit type: | SECOND AMENDMENT |
| Region: | USA |
| Date: | 26 Oct 2023 |
| Auditor: |  Audit the Audit |
| Title: | Good Cop DEFENDS Citizen From His Fellow Officers! |
| Description: | The first 100 people to use code AUDIT with the link below will get 60% off of Incogni: http://incogni.com/audit Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw Spotify: https://spoti.fi/439TpHT Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit Submit your videos here: auditheaudit@gmail.com Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellify.com Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing. This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism. Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them. FAIR USE This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video. Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCaPlT3XQ1A&t=11s Eitai from Up High’s channel - https://www.youtube.com/@eitai44 Sources: Ohio Rev. Code § 2921.29- https://bit.ly/3iWHTuK State v. Blair- https://bit.ly/44Xb8SB State v. Deacey- https://bit.ly/3PD2kgs Graham v. Connor- https://bit.ly/3vk7YaX Terry v. Ohio- https://bit.ly/2SFAnK9 U.S. v. Heath- https://bit.ly/48ggYSg Navarette v. California- https://bit.ly/2Nzuo6W State v. Burnett- https://bit.ly/48hrcS8 Srisavath v. City of Brentwood- https://bit.ly/48hLyLk Smith v. City of Cumming- https://bit.ly/2XRc26E Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck- https://bit.ly/3ZKEEIL Lloyd Corp. v. Tanner- https://bit.ly/3AvCsvC |
| Additional notes: | No further details entered |
Organization's Details
Typically, the auditor or a moderator would complete the below information. This is optional on whether an auditor would like to add more detail to this public record and share this page, such as the audited organization's contact details.
(also used for those "you do not wanna call.." moments LOL)
| Organization name: | No further details entered |
|---|---|
| Type: | No further details entered |
| Location: | No further details entered |
| Contact person: | No further details entered |
| Contact phone: | No further details entered |
| Contact position: | No further details entered |
| Website: | No further details entered |
| Additional Notes: | No further details entered |
Public Officials Details
Details of the public officials involved - tyrants or stars.
| No further details entered | |
| Additional Notes: |
|---|
Comments
Express yourself, if you wish.
Please respect other opinions, no hate speech, no incitement to violence. Basically, be a cool human :)